More about me.

Education and opportunity inequality

I almost got kicked out of my secondary school because of the unfairness I faced at the Malaysia ISEF selection fair.

Despite having the privilege of going to a top Chinese public school that allowed me to get into science research early on (which I'm still grateful for), I realised how unfair these opportunities are, hidden behind their own quiet privileges.

The most ironic part is that after I spent so much time on my first research project, I didn't make it to ISEF. I was really disappointed, especially after nearly a year of constant effort and skipping an entire year of school to do my research.

When I asked the judges for feedback, I was told it was undisclosed. I emailed ISEF officials because I wanted to know how they had chosen the finalists. My school then told me to write an apology letter to the Ministry of Education.

I was really upset about what happened at the fair. But the more I thought about it, the more I wondered how many students never even get the chance to do research.

The lack of transparency isn't only about how students are judged. Access to research itself can be hard to see. Only a few schools in Malaysia even have science research opportunities like this, and many students don't even know they can take part in research at all. For students outside a handful of elite schools, the door to science research didn't even exist in the first place. Malaysia's Ministry of Education received RM66.2 billion in Budget 2026, yet too much of the effort goes into filler competitions and events, and we're still lacking when it comes to letting students break out of their boundaries.

I hated seeing how systemic bias and structural barriers limit opportunities for youth talent, so I decided to take things into my own hands and founded MYResearchGuide to help more youth across Malaysia access science research opportunities regardless of their background or socioeconomic status.

Though this is just my first step toward democratising opportunity, I'm not waiting for the system to fix itself.

I want to build the architecture that lets anyone, regardless of their background, get the shot they deserve.

Putting AI to good use to advance humanity

I've spent enough time in AI research to see both sides of it up close.

One side is exciting. The 2024 Nobel Prize in Chemistry went to work on protein structure prediction, a problem biologists had been stuck on for decades until AI cracked it open. Moments like that convinced me AI isn't just a tool for automating tasks. It can genuinely extend what humans can solve.

The other side worries me. The companies building the most powerful AI systems aren't doing it purely out of curiosity or a desire to help people. There's an enormous amount of money and geopolitical leverage on the line, with the US and China alone pouring hundreds of billions into AI infrastructure and racing for dominance, and that changes the incentives. UN AI safety experts have warned that AI capability is already outpacing both scientific understanding and government policy, leaving governance fragmented and many countries reliant on systems they can't fully assess or control. What scares me is not just people losing jobs, but decisions increasingly resting on systems neither the public nor the people governing us fully understand.

I don't think either outcome is guaranteed. This could end with AI making life better for most people, or with a small number of people holding all the power while everyone else gets left behind. Which one happens depends a lot on who's actually in the room shaping this, not just engineers, but policymakers, researchers, journalists, and people willing to hold this industry accountable.

That future is still ours to shape. If we take AI's risks seriously early, we have a chance to share its benefits widely and address the dangers before they become impossible to ignore.

That work has to start now, not later.